King Nebuchadnezzar gloried in his
kingdom and declared: “Is this not magnificent Babylon, which I have built as a
royal capital by my mighty power and for my glorious majesty?” (Daniel 4:30).
While the words were still in his mouth, a voice came from heaven to inform him
that the kingdom he was boasting about had been taken away from him.
Similarly, Bola Tinubu, “the
Ashiwaju of Yorubaland,” surveyed his kingdom and decided to make a boastful
proclamation. Speaking of himself in the third person, Tinubu declared:
“Nobody, no one under the sun, under the United Nations Human Rights Charter,
can stop Bola Tinubu’s ambition.” Famous last words! The voice of the electorate
in the South-West has answered Tinubu. His personal ambition is certainly not
in the interest of the people.
De-mystification of Tinubu
Tinubu’s claim to fame lies in the
strength of his ACN party in the South-West. The only resistance was Ondo
State, which was controlled by Olusegun Mimiko’s Labour party. But the
assumption was that it was only a matter of time before Ondo too would succumb
to the Tinubu juggernaut. However, in the 2012 gubernatorial election in Ondo,
Mimiko not only prevailed once again, the ACN candidate did not even come
second. He was beaten to a distant third by the PDP.
This indicated that the Yorubas were
already getting fed up with Tinubu; determined that they will not be sold into
his slavery. In a letter to Mimiko congratulating him on his victory, Reuben
Fasoranti, the leader of the Yoruba group, Afenifere, said: “This victory,
amongst other things, is victory over god-fatherism, a rejection of political
imposition and slavery from outside the state.” “We entered into electoral cooperation
with you (Mimiko) in the election to counter an emerging group under the
leadership of few disrespectful, snobbish, arrogant, ravaging and power-thirsty
politicians.”
The obvious reference here was to
Bola Tinubu and his ACN colleagues. In many respects, Tinubu has become the
most hated politician in the South-West. Association with him is
increasingly as politically contagious as leprosy. The emerging consensus in
the South-West is that Tinubu has overreached himself with his
heavy-handedness. It is past time to cut him back to size. Thus, Fasoranti
added to Mimiko: “There is a need for the exhibition of fair play and justice
to all and carry the banner of progressive politics into national politics now
that the eclipse of the ACN is unavoidable.”
Ekiti Waterloo
This prognosis has proved to be
prophetic. The defeat of Tinubu’s party in Ondo has now been followed by its
trouncing in the just-concluded gubernatorial election in Ekiti. Ekiti was
presumed to be one of Tinubu’s South-West strongholds. The incumbent governor,
Kayode Fayemi, is one of the darlings of Tinubu’s new-fangled APC. Indeed, some
have been touting Fayemi as a possible APC vice-presidential candidate.
However, rather than confirm that Ekiti is firmly in Tinubu’s camp, the people
of Ekiti decided to send a loud and clear message to Tinubu. They no longer
want to have anything to do with him and with his party.
Tinubu’s Fayemi did not only lose
the Ekiti election, he lost it by a landslide. He obtained 120,000 votes to Ayo
Fayose’s 203,000. Fayemi lost in every local government area of the state.
Coming on the heels of its defeat in Ondo, the APC rout in Ekiti is conclusive
proof that Tinubu’s fabled stranglehold on South-West politics has ended.
Indeed, Tinubu is now a political liability in the South-West. Rather than
bring votes to the APC in the region, he is now more than likely to lose them.
This accounts for the confused
reaction of the APC to the election. Local and international observers declared
it free and fair. The losing local candidates readily accepted defeat,
including Fayemi, the APC candidate. But Tinubu and his APC cohorts from
outside the state are challenging the defeat in a pathetic attempt to make
excuses for such disgraceful trouncing in putative APC territory. Only the
gullible will believe this face-saving charade.
On the contrary, a prescient
observer of the APC debacle in Ekiti made this observation: “Tinubu is no
Awolowo and that illusion is being put to test. He doesn’t have the gravitas of
Papa Awo and in fact, many of these South-West state governors will soon
discover that they are more electable without Tinubu’s name.
Tinubu cost Fayemi
the election and if he knows what is good he should stay in the background if
Osun State (whose election is due two months hence) is not to fall in a
domino.”
“Useless” Yoruba Obas
It was a long time coming, but
Yorubas in general are now fed up with Bola Tinubu’s arrogance and with his
determination to rule the South-West as his fiefdom. A politician is supposed
to be subject to his people.
However, Tinubu believes the Yorubas are subject
to him. The over-bearing influence of Tinubu in Ekiti politics was one of the
major issues of the campaign. The message of the electorate is that this would
no longer be tolerated. This message was superbly championed by Fayose who
presented himself as a man of the people, determined to stop the hemorrhage
whereby Ekiti money was routinely shipped to Lagos.
A smart politician does not
broadcast his contempt for his people. However, with the arrogance of power,
Tinubu derided Yoruba Obas as “useless.” He declared “ex cathedra:” “The good
Obas in Yorubaland who are forthright, firm and stand by the truth are not up
to five, they are just three.” With these words, Tinubu drove a nail firmly
into his own political coffin. While he derided Yoruba Obas as “useless,” he
went up North to Kwankwaso to engineer the installation of a “useful” Emir of
Kano. Therefore, the Ekiti people decided to tell Tinubu that they have no use
for him and that their Obas are not useless.
The success of Fashola in
transforming the face of Lagos was sold as the ACN/APC template in the
South-West, and this had some traction for a while. Fayemi too presented
himself as a “performing governor” with major projects right across the state.
But when asked why he did not build low-cost housing in Lagos, Fashola replied
contemptuously that he could not find any low-cost cement to buy. But as its
defeat in Ekiti now demonstrates; the elitist high-cost APC needs low-cost
voters in order to win elections. What the PDP did mischievously in Ekiti was
to capitalise on the electorate’s cynical preference for pounded-yam over
tarred roads.
Lessons from Obasanjo
The rejection of Bola Tinubu today
in the South-West also lies in the very betrayal of his earlier success. Tinubu
championed South-West resistance to Obasanjo’s determination to sacrifice
Yoruba interests on the altar of a contrived alliance with the North. While
that alliance clearly served Obasanjo’s interests, independent-minded
South-West voters saw nothing in it for them. Foolishly, Tinubu is now
presenting himself as yet another architect of the same rejected alliance with
the Northern caliphate, for the sake of his own personal political ambitions.
Following the crisis that ensued
after the annulment of M.K.O. Abiola’s victory in the 1993 presidential
election, there emerged a general consensus that the 1999 election should be
zoned to South-West Yorubas in the interest of national reconciliation.
However, Northerners decided they would determine who the Yoruba candidate
should be. Obasanjo was fished out of prison and anointed as PDP presidential
candidate.
This Yoruba choice by Northerners
was rejected by the Yorubas. Although Obasanjo went ahead to win the election
nationwide, he lost woefully in the South-West. Thereafter, he was derided as a
president without coattails in his own backyard. Obasanjo’s response as
president was to make a play for PDP victory in the South-West in 2003 by hook
or crook. Every trick in the book was employed to bring South-West states under
PDP control.
Failure of success
The PDP rigged the 2003 elections
masterfully and wrested back power from every ACN-controlled South-West state
except Lagos. Even in Lagos, the INEC went ahead to proclaim a fictitious PDP
victory on its website, before this was belatedly withdrawn with ignominy. The
brilliant South-West answer to this PDP treachery was Bola Tinubu.
Tinubu drew a line in the sand, held
on to Lagos, and struck back from this stronghold to win back all the lost
South-West states in 2007. He won because the people of the South-West refused
to mortgage their future to the political interests of Obasanjo and his allies
in the North. It is therefore surprising that, with the arrogance of power,
Tinubu is now following the same failed footsteps of Obasanjo.
Instead of learning from Obasanjo’s
blunder, Tinubu too has now decided to unite his ethnic ACN party with the
Northern caliphate. With the contempt for the people that has come with years
of monarchical control over the ACN, Tinubu presumes South-West people will
follow him sheepishly into this alliance with the North, just because his
burning ambition to become the vice-president of Nigeria now demands it. But
what this has achieved is to show that Tinubu’s ambitions are anathema to
South-West interests.
Anybody who thinks Tinubu’s APC will
succeed in the South-West does not understand South-West politics. The Yorubas
are too proud and fiercely independent to agree to play second-fiddle to anyone
because of a man called Tinubu. S.L. Akintola tried the same gambit in the
1960s, and the South-West rejected him. The same rejection has befallen Bola
Tinubu.
Lagosians are disgusted that Tinubu
has privatised their politics. His wife, daughter and even son-in-law have been
steam-rolled into vantage political positions. The state’s finances are tied to
Alpha Beta. Tinubu has even gone ahead to anoint Akinwunmi Ambode as the next
governor of the state without the benefit of any election. This is asking for
trouble. If Tinubu is not careful, a big implosion is likely in APC Lagos State
over the issue of the choice of the next governor.

No comments:
Post a Comment